Daily Archives: December 31, 2007

What’s the difference between tags and categories?

Whats the diff between tags and categories? I am sure WordPress (good folks that they are) can enlighten me. I guess I need to invest some time in knowing more about blogging. *sigh* so little time, so much to do.

They are both indexing systems. Right? So why have two? Do I have too many categories?

Leave a comment

Filed under blogging

Banished Words List 2008

End of the year lists are so much fun.  Here is one that suggests we ban over-used and cliched words from  the language.  I may disagree with banning organic.  Some of them just need to be reigned in.  And waterboarding.  If anything, given that the US DOES torture (even when we don’t  =|:-)=  ), we need to talk about this more, not less.
Lake Superior State University :: Banished Words List
ORGANIC – Overused and misused to describe not only food, but computer products or human behavior, and often used when describing something as “natural,” says Crystal Giordano of Brooklyn, New York. Another advertising gimmick to make things sound better than they really are, according to Rick DeVan of Willoughby, Ohio, who said he has heard claims such as “My business is organic,” and computers having “organic software.”

Leave a comment

Filed under words

Mapping Manhattan

I was fascinated to read about this project to make a detailed, 3D, explorable map of Manhattan before contact and conquest. It sounds like secondlife! And the use of real markers and connections to the 3d map will enable even more cross-over from virtual to real world and vice-versa. Another blogger who lives in NY waxes about the project.

Our Local Correspondents: The Mannahatta Project: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker
Eric Sanderson, a landscape ecologist with the Wildlife Conservation Society (W.C.S.), is in charge of a project called the Human Footprint, which seeks to map the human race’s impact on the surface of the earth. New York is the ultimate case. “It’s probably the fastest, biggest land-coverage swing in history,” Sanderson said. For nearly a decade, he has been working on the Mannahatta Project, an attempt to determine exactly how Manhattan would have appeared to Hudson and his crew in 1609. It will include a lavish book; a Web site; a possible exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History; and a three-dimensional computer map which would allow you to fly above the island, land wherever you want, and look around. Eventually, Sanderson would like to put up plaques around town calling attention to vanished landmarks.

My friend Alex Pulsipher, who has an intro textbook for Geography has talked to me about his ideas for the future of that book. Wandering around our old haunts in Knoxville we were discussing the use of educational games, internet publishing, and learning. The Manhattana Project may be a great example of that future. But why stop with traveling around? Why not let people create modules that would run in the map/world? Replay Hudson’s voyage? Replay the local Indian’s use of land. Having student’s design these modules and discuss what matters and how to incorporate what they know would engage them and force them to make consequential choices based on their current knowledge and intellectual perspectives.

Manhattana Project Image

Leave a comment

Filed under digital culture, Future of Technology, Gaming, geography, pedagogy

Bipartisanship is a chimera

This may be more overtly political than usual on this blog, but Paul Krugman in todays’ NY Times column (behind a security wall…) nails it.

There’s a fantasy, widely held inside the Beltway, that men and women of good will from both parties can be brought together to hammer out bipartisan solutions to the nation’s problems.

He’s talking about how the Republican Presidnetila candidates all adhere to the bankrupt economic policies of movement conservatism. All tax cuts all the time. The fantasy of bipartisanship drives me nuts, especially coming form the mainstream media. I am all in favor in compromise, but, only when the other side wants to compromise. When you look at how the Club for Growth types attacks Huckabee, or Specter in his 20o4 re-election, or McCain, you see how much they control the Republican party machinery. They won’t sit at the table. They are ideologues. You can tell becuase the answer to every question is tax cuts. How can tax cuts be needed when the economy is doing well and poorly?

Politics is a contact sport. It is about power. When common ground can be found, great. Otherwise, strap on your helmet and be ready to play and to fight.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Power, Activism