Filed under ethics, higher education, Military, Research, Scholars, Social Networks
Tagged as network
I wrote, “must be a blessing to feel so pure, Sam Friedman.” The whole thing reminds me of the only quote from Kipling that I like: “you may talk o’ gin an’ beer/when you’re quartered safe out ‘ere.”
…and now I wonder if the grad students who posted to the list will now be blackballed academically for disagreeing with him.
Here are responses so far. Thanks poll daddy!
It is important to discuss ethical issues
It should go on on SOCNET
It was good, but should end now
It’s ok, short or long. SNA is used for war strategy. Ethics lines are needed.
Must be a blessing to feel so pure, Sam Friedman.
its nice to have a lively debate!
Let people talk if they like. I can (and others can) delete w/o reading.
it’s the (necessary) nature of the listserve beast.
It is shaping well, particularly with the post by Charles Kadushin
Posters should be more careful/thoughtful about their responses.
I think it should go on for longer, unless there is another appropriate fora.
it was appropriate, helpful, and important
Not sure – interesting discussion, but getting a bit heat-not-light now
Fine as long as SNA remains focus and people snip length per Barry’s request
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,548 other followers