A post at orgtheory.net took me to this libertarian blog and site.
The author wondered why people would assume non-profits do more for a community than firms.
I forwarded this to some colleagues with similar interests and we may have run aground of some moderating policies as our comments do not seem to have been posted. Hmmmmm. I guess even free market of ideas people need some ground rules.
I’ll see if my comments go up later.
Basically, I pointed out that
1) The author seems to work for a non-profit. So his stance of “who are those people” is ironic.
2) Non-profit versus profit is a meaningless distinction to make when discussin what they do or how they are perceived.
3) NPs that perform vital services are seen as more community-oriented because they ARE. That does not mean that they are immune from critique. Likewise, firms that push externalities onto communities or that use their political and economic power to suck up more value are seen as less community-minded because their actions ARE.