I feel like I need one stop shopping for my institutional theory, fields, emergence, and logics chapter.
How do other people do this?
Traditionally, I suppose I would have taken reading notes or annotations on each item. Then a draft would be written using quotations from those sources.
Now I have notes and annotations scattered across many sources. There are
I am feeling stymied by how best to proceed. As this is a topic I will come back to, I am interested not just in finishing this draft, but also in having a tool or resource. I can keep adding to for future writing. A secondary benefit is using it for teaching or for collaborating.
Pros: Seems most direct. No worries about other tools.
Cons: each search may lead me down rabbit holes. Relying on memory or other ways to access lit may bias me in a direction. Has been aggravating in the past.
2. Use Excel. I would make a spreadsheet with all the resources. They are ranked by essentiality. I could add some rough summaries of some resources I have. I can then add fields as necessary. One issue is what to do with quotes. If I put them in a field, or in new columns, each record could get really LONG (down the screen) or WIDE (across). A variation is to add a hyperlink to a file of good quotes from each one.
Pros: Easy to add and manipulate records.
Cons: Not easy to get material from spreadsheet into a paper. If the spreadsheet is very big, cumbersome to find things. If I use hyperlinks, I still have to hunt in that file for quotes.
3. Use Word. Like Excel. I would use Word and have it as a table. Easier to edit text in Word. Still not sure what to do with quotations. If I try to go “wide” as in extra columns for quotations, then it can get very wide quickly. Like Excel, not sure how to organize quotations anyway.
Pros: Better word editing than excel.
Cons: Table may have upper limit of rows and columns
4. Use Nvivo. Nvivo can code in PDFs AND in word documents. So, if one starts from scratch, one can build many possible searchable nodes into a library of documents. This is very good for supporting multiple projects with same or similar literature. It also has analytical features, like searching for words and using that as the basis for coding. It can output what is collected. It can also support theory building through queries.
Pros: Building multi-use, multi-project tool. Searching PDFs AND documents. Search and query functions for theory building. With reports, can extract the references with their quotes.
Cons: can not edit tables/databases in Nvivo. Time intensive right now.
5. Use a wiki-like tool such as google sites. I have already done this some in compiling some synthetic notes about Institutional theory or operating definitions for this project.
Pros: With hyperlinks, somewhat easier to get from one topic to another.
Cons: Would have to cut and paste all content. No obvious way to include pdfs.
Subject lines from a senior colleague that are likely to make a junior colleague hit the ceiling.
– “Bad news for you.”
– “There is no such thing as too much teaching.”
– “How about chairing the X committee?”
– “PUSHED THE WRONG BUTTON!”
Which one did I get today?
Click to see. Continue reading