In the process of tacklign a fun but gnarly research and theory question for a draft, i started to think about how to use past knowledge and tools to do better research. One issue for me is that I at times internalize what I read, forget the source or notes I took, and then when I shift from drafting to revising and I want more literature on hand, I have to recreate what I did or start a frsustrating search through my files.
Here is the problem and solutions.
Ok, here is a research and writing process question.
I am at the point in a draft when I need to tackle two big questions based on readings in literature.
1) What have institutional theorists said about new fields? Specifically, are they characterized by uncertainty, flux, or turbulence?
2) What has been said about how institutional logics affect new fields.
I have a wide set of resources on this.
A) Books or articles I have read and extracted quotes from.
B) Articles in PDF format I have read and/or annotated but NOT pulled quotations from.
C) Unread articles or books that I know from searches are directly relevant to these questions.
How should I proceed?
1) Quick fix. Make a new word file. Paste in all relevant quotes from existing notes. Add nw notes from read or unread until satisfied with answer.
2) Fix that involves creating new knowledge infrastructure I will use from here on. I learned how to use Nvivo, a qual data analysis tool. I realized that everything it does to store, sort, annotate, and index qual data is THE SAME process as one uses for theory. Why not tackle this problem using that. Then I would have a single source this and future research projects. Downside: maybe some learning curve to implement.
3) Fix that involves making the single document in #1, but using a web-based tool, like google docs, so that my collaborators can see and contribute. Note, this can also be done AFTER #2 is done as Nvivo can produce reports of relevant material.