Dinesh D’souza is speaking in a week here. A student club is bringing him. He is a travesty to literary analysis as he bases his whole “Obama wants to destroy America” on a wacky reading of Obama’s book. I would get nothing out of going and challenging him. But it irks me no one else might not.
Stanley Fish says what I would like to: “This is disappointing. While a viewer could certainly disagree with D’Souza’s analysis of the genesis and emergence of Obama’s views, it is nevertheless an analysis to which one could respond in the usual spirit of intellectual debate by saying things like “you’ve left something out” or “you draw your conclusion too quickly.” But as the movie picks up polemical speed, philosophy, political theory and psychology are left behind and replaced by name-calling, and by a name-calling that brings D’Souza close to positions he rejects. For instance, he rejects birtherism, the contention that Obama was born in Kenya and is hence not an American citizen; but he replaces it with a back-door, or metaphorical, birtherism when he characterizes Obama as an alien being, as a fifth-column party of one who has pretended to be an American, and technically is one, but really is something else.” http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/obama-dsouza-and-anti-colonialism/
- Bill Maher Takes On Dinesh D’Souza Over Anti-Obama Documentary 2016 (mediaite.com)
- Arab Winter, the rise of radical Islam (republicmainstreet.wordpress.com)
- Documentary Review: Dinesh D’Souza Unsuccessfully Reaches With 2016 (forbes.com)