Is this a problem?
Tag Archives: Books
This was emailed to me three years ago, and is very amusing. Allan Friedman wrote posted it, but the link is dead, so I am posting here so it does not die.
How pop social scientists order at a restaurant August 23, 2005
Not new, but an utterly brilliant piece from kottke.org needs to be shared. A group of made-for-mass-consumption social science books have been released over the past few years looking at decision-making processes. How would their authors order at a restaurant?
Blink by Malcolm Gladwell
Glance quickly at the menu and order whatever catches your eye first. Spend no more than 2-3 seconds deciding or the quality of your choice (and your meal) will decline.
Freakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner
The key to ordering a good meal in a restaurant is understanding the economic incentives involved. Ask the server what they recommend and order something else…they are probably trying to get you to order something with a high profit margin or a dish that the restaurant needs to get rid of before the chicken goes bad or something. Never order the second least expensive bottle of wine; it’s typically the one with the highest mark-up on the list (i.e. the worst deal).
The Paradox of Choice by Barry Schwartz
Take the menu and rip it into 4 or 5 pieces. Order from only one of the pieces, ignoring the choices on the rest of the menu. You will be happier with your meal.
The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki
Poll the other patrons at the restaurant about what they’re having and order the most popular choices for yourself.
Everything Bad is Good for You by Steven Johnson
Order anything made with lots of butter, sugar, etc. Avoid salad or anything organic. A meal of all desserts may be appropriate. Or see if you can get the chef to make you a special dish like foie gras and bacon covered with butterscotch and hot fudge. Ideally, you will have brought a Super Sized McDonald’s Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese Meal into the restaurant with you. Smoke and drink liberally.
Charles Kadushin sent out an email awhile ago asking for reviewers for Social Networks. i would love to see the network folks sink their teeth into the explosion of general audience/practitioner books out there.
he listed the following at the time as possibilities:
Social Networks and Marketing, by Christophe Van den Bulte and Stefan Wuyts, Marketing Science Institute, 2007.
Andy Sernovitz and Guy Kawasaki, Word of Mouth Marketing: How smart companies get people talking. Kaplan Publishing, 2006 Mark Hughes, Buzz Marketing, Penguin 2006 Dave Balter and John Butman, Grapevine: the new art of word-of-mouth marketing. Penguin 2005.
Add Seth Godin’s Tribes: We need you to Lead us (2008) to the list.
I remember how excited I was to read Emirbayer’s 1997 “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” I was in grad school, and I was eager for a manifesto to inspire me to academic arms. The essay did just that. But, as I tried to work it into PhD papers and a dissertation, I didn’t cite it as much as I might have. It was too big, too bold, too general for a dissertation. And I had the feeling that it was too “out there.”
One of the things I liked especially was the way it seemed to leave behind a debate about networks as method or networks as theory. Network analysis is a method, of course, but to ask the right questions, to understand the implications, requires a relational perspective. Borgatti and others have since started their power points on networks, I’ve noticed, with an intro to a “network perspective.”
Now I see this book over at Edward Elgar called :
Not only that, but I was put onto it because of a review of the book in AMR.
Three quick observations
1) It seems that relationalism as a rallying point has emerged and my early reading of Emribayer was part of many schoalrs picking up on those ideas and beginning a process of importng them into org studies and management schoalrship.
2) The Above volume draws heavily form work done on identity, inequality, and feminist theory. The influence of feminist theory on relationalism is new to me, but makes sense.
3) there was not much on the study of networks and relationalism in the TOC. Maybe that is a niche that can continue to be exploited/developed? Or is network analysis simply a tool that is appropriated differently by scholars depending on your prior interest. if you are focused on how to strategically manage alliances, you use networks one way, and if you are interested in the way interdependence leads to emergence of inequality, you use network analysis a different way. The use of the suite of network analysis tools does not imbue the scholarship with a particularly relational and there fore challenging or radically different epistemology to normally static and atomistic social science.
OK, I leave for five weeks in a week. Its mostly vacation, but I am looking forward to spending some time reading some of the dense social theory or social science books that I rely on, but have never finished or even read (ouch, hurts to admit that in print). I’ll probably get drummed out of the bidness (its like our omerta) for saying this, but when you read lots of journal article,s you start to know what are the foundational texts and how they are used. Its like seeing the shape of a plane by its shadow. Foucault, is, I think a classic in this regard. Everyone cites, few have actually read (beyond strategic skimming). And Weber. (Although I did take a grad school seminar where we did nothing but read Economy and Society. That’s a story for another time).
Anyway, for the sake of _actually_ reading some of these from my ever-expanding list of books, I am limiting myself to two. So, this is the fun part, like choosing courses from a stellar menu. Which two?
Possible summer reading list (In Progress):
- Identity and Control by Harrison White
- Sociology of Philosophy by Randall Collins
- Constitution of Society by Anthony Giddens
- Volumes 2 and 3 of The Information Age by Manuel Castells
- The Hacker Ethic By Pekka Hinamen
- something by Bourdieu…
- Brokerage and Closure by Ron Burt
- Something by Charles Tilly, Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons or Identities, Boundaries and Social Ties
- Code v 2.0 by Lawrence Lessig
- The Hacker Ethic by Pekka Himanen (for teaching really).