For awhile, I have been trying to assemble a list of journal outlets for myself.
If we think back to what journals we follow, I think many might have a similar story to mine. I recall as an undergrad and in grad school in sociology and management, I would hold in high esteem what professors gave me. I quickly learned to “read backwards”: to take a new article and glance at the citations (or to look at the intro and lit review) and start taking mental notes of which articles and authors seemed most central. From this, I had a preliminary list of journals that seemed important.
And those handful of journals I tended to follow more carefully since I already had a toehold in their conversations and streams of discourse.
Meanwhile, keyword searches in article databases exposed me to reading lots of abstracts. Quickly, I started making snap decisions about journals worth paying attention to and which not.
Since then (1990s), I have the feeling that the number and volume of published material has increased. Overwhelmed is an understatement. This is compounded by my own multi-disciplinary interests in networks, social theory, and organization theory.
Finally, I have realized that some of my own writing, if it is ever to see the light of published day, due to approaches or ideas that are out of the mainstream, will need to find journals that will take risks, are in the interstices of academic fields, that consort with subaltern, or embrace eclecticism.
How does one find new journals? That is the immediate problem. This morning I tackled this as I wondered who might look at approaches to innovation that are more unconventional. This often means abandoning the fool’s errand of a quest for the holy grail of The One True Formula for Success™. I was kind of hoping that maybe I would find the Amazon equivalent of list mania. You know, you find some new book and you see that other users have made this lovley lists like “Best mashups of Harry Potter and Literary Theory” or “Teen Vampire Stories that Don’t Suck” or “How to make social media work for you.” I guess I wanted “Journals that Think You, _____________ (insert name), Are Brillant.”
The good orgheads at orgtheory.net tried to make a crowd source list, but it seems to have run aground.
Loet Leysdorf does lots of work of co-citation data to make centrality measures of journals, like this one.
A colleague once gave me this list that is pretty comprehensive: the Harzing list. I like it since it includes several different quality metrics.
There are lots of outfits that provide various lists and analyses of journals.
But I am looking for a little more editorial content. Shorter lists that are more targeted and not hide-bound to overly rigid disciplinary boundaries. More opinion. More oomph.
Why don’t they seem to exist? I say this based on two dangerously self-referential observations. 1) I don’t already know about them. 2) 20 minutes of basic web searching failed to turn anything up. Sociology of Knowledge by the inmates is probably a bad idea, but I can’t help myself. Maybe they don’t exist because opinion and oomph are not rational career strategies?
Where can I submit theory articles?
Where can I submit articles on innovation that are interested in inter-disciplinarity?
Mixed method articles?
I’ll start making my own here.
Meanwhile, feel free to post ideas or suggestions below. Thanks.